Apache Airflow has become an indispensable tool to help data teams perform complex data orchestration and workflow management. Its elasticity in development and scheduling capabilities have made it a popular service that data engineers and analysts use prominently within their data stacks.
Even with its many advantages, Airflow isn’t immune to a variety of challenges. The most common one cited by users is when Airflow appears to be running smoothly but produces inaccurate data or experiences performance issues. The issue in cases like this is not necessarily Airflow itself, but rather, it’s the quality of the data it is using. Like any tool in the data stack, data quality is what determines the potential success or failure of outcomes.
The key to ensuring data quality is awareness of data issues. For data teams, this means having robust and accurate monitoring and real-time alerting mechanisms which are independent of the Airflow tool, and can determine, with precision, when there are issues and where they’re located within a data environment.
Perhaps the most basic advantage of Airflow is that it enables data engineers to define, schedule, and monitor intricate data pipelines. It does this with units called Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs), which provide visibility into the execution and status of each task. A DAG typically represents a collection of tasks that are being run, and it is organized to show relationships between tasks in the Airflow UI. This orchestration capability ensures that data transformations, extractions, and loads occur smoothly, improving operational efficiency and reducing manual intervention.
However, while Airflow excels at scheduling and executing tasks, it doesn’t inherently address the quality of the data flowing through these tasks. Airflow's user-friendly interface and workflow design might lead you to believe that everything is functioning optimally. But appearances can be deceiving. The real test of Airflow's efficiency lies in the accuracy of the generated data and the reliability of its execution. When you encounter data discrepancies, tasks that hang indefinitely, or idle jobs, data teams need a way to dig deeper.
Digging deeper, however, isn’t just a matter of getting more insights. Those insights must be correlated to causes and outcomes, and must link Airflow tasks to have a comprehensive view of what’s actually happening with the data. This is precisely the role of the concept of data observability, which extends beyond traditional monitoring by focusing on understanding the behavior of data as it flows through a system. It encompasses tracking, measuring, and analyzing data in real-time to identify anomalies, inconsistencies, and data quality issues. Unlike conventional monitoring, which often stops at surface-level metrics, data observability delves deep into the characteristics and context of data, providing a comprehensive view of its health and integrity.
Data observability offers a holistic perspective on data quality that goes beyond the binary notion of "success" or "failure." It provides insights into how data changes over time, how it's transformed across different stages of the pipeline, and how it aligns with business expectations. This level of understanding is essential for maintaining trust in data-driven decisions.
To ensure the reliability of your Airflow workflows, it's crucial to implement a proactive monitoring and alerting strategy. This strategy will help you identify issues early, mitigate potential risks, and maintain the integrity of your data pipelines. Here's how to approach it:
A data observability solution like the Acceldata Data Observability Platform offers a path to deeper and more accurate insights about the performance and overall quality of data. Acceldata users can take advantage of the Acceldata Airflow SDK which provides APIs, decorators, and operators that allow for fine-grained end-to-end tracking and visibility of Airflow DAGs. The Airflow SDK provides specific observability features that include:
Teams that use the Acceldata Airflow API get alerts that proactively notify data engineers and stakeholders about potential data anomalies, discrepancies, or quality degradation. They are not limited to detecting pipeline failures, however; they also identify issues that might not be immediately apparent but could significantly impact downstream analysis and decision-making.
These alerts transform the platform from a task executor into a data quality guardian. Consider a scenario where a certain transformation task in the pipeline is returning abnormally high values for a critical business metric. Without data observability and quality alerts, this issue might go unnoticed until it negatively affects business outcomes. With data quality alerts, engineers can be promptly informed about the anomaly, allowing them to investigate and rectify the problem before it escalates.
By integrating data quality checks and alerts, as well as audit, balance, control into the DAGs, organizations can ensure that data is not only processed but also scrutinized for accuracy. This collaboration enhances the value of data pipelines by:
Airflow's elasticity in development and scheduling might make it seem like a straightforward tool, but the true test of its reliability lies in the quality of data it produces and the consistency of its execution. Implementing a comprehensive monitoring and alerting mechanism is essential to promptly identify and address issues before they escalate. By monitoring performance metrics, validating data accuracy, analyzing task dependencies, ensuring proper logging, and setting up real-time alerts, you can maintain the health and effectiveness of your Airflow workflows. Remember, the key to success is not just in running workflows, but in ensuring they run accurately and efficiently.
Photo by Mathew Schwartz on Unsplash